AWS or Azure, teams can redirect their energy from infrastructure maintenance to improving the actual applications.
Breaking large applications into smaller, independent microservices provides another effective approach. This makes it easier for teams to update specific components without impacting the entire system. Small, focused teams can work on different services simultaneously, which speeds up both development and debt reduction.
Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) helps prevent new technical debt from piling up. These practices automate building, testing and deploying code changes, catching issues early before they become bigger problems. Regular code reviews and automated testing also help maintain quality standards and reduce the chances of creating more debt.
Even government agencies have found success with modern approaches to technical debt. Utah’s CIO Alan Fuller shared how moving systems to the cloud and using off-the-shelf solutions helped cut support costs for custom applications. The National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO) recommends using low-code tools to tackle technical debt by enabling non-technical staff to build applications quickly. Learn more about these government modernization efforts in this State Tech Magazine article. These examples show that updating legacy systems works even within complex government structures, leading to better resource use and faster development cycles.
Running software projects requires making smart decisions about where to spend time and money. Here’s how successful companies handle the balancing act between fixing technical debt and developing new features.
To get your team and leadership on board with addressing technical debt, you need to show them concrete benefits. Focus on explaining how fixing technical issues will help the business - like shipping features faster, making customers happier, or reducing ongoing costs. Add specific numbers whenever you can, like “Fixing this will save us 20 hours of developer time per month.” This helps everyone understand why spending resources on technical debt makes good business sense.
Many successful companies use structured approaches to decide where to invest their resources. A common method is ranking technical debt issues based on three key factors: business impact, technical risk level, and how easy they are to fix. The problems that score high in all three areas become top priorities. You might find helpful tips in this guide about code refactoring best practices. It’s also important to track concrete metrics - like number of bugs or time spent fixing issues - to guide your decisions and show the impact of your work.
Finding the right balance between fixing existing problems and building new features is tricky. If you spend too much time on technical debt, you might fall behind competitors. But if you ignore it completely, your codebase could become unstable. Research from Accenture shows that successful companies typically spend about 15% of their IT budget on technical debt. They also found that spending too much on fixes actually gives diminishing returns. The key is to align your investments with clear business goals and technical needs.
Resource planning isn’t something you do once and forget about. You need to regularly check how well your technical debt fixes are working and adjust your approach based on what you learn. Keep track of your progress toward specific goals, and be ready to shift resources when business needs change or new challenges come up. Make sure to keep everyone informed about what you’re doing and why - this helps maintain support for technical debt work over the long run.
Managing technical debt requires more than quick fixes - it needs a complete rethinking of your software development approach. Creating lasting change means building quality and sustainability into every development step. Here’s how to create that culture of excellence in your team.
Code reviews should be collaborative learning opportunities, not tedious requirements. Set up review partnerships between experienced and newer developers to share knowledge naturally. Clear guidelines help keep reviews focused and constructive. The goal is catching issues early while helping everyone improve their skills.
Raw line counts don’t tell the full story of code health. Focus on metrics that matter: cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, and defect density. Track these over time to spot trouble areas early. Use the data to guide where you focus debt reduction efforts and measure your progress.
Technical debt isn’t just an engineering problem - it needs buy-in across teams. Product managers play a key role by balancing new features with maintenance work. When leadership actively supports debt reduction, it shows the whole organization values sustainable development practices.
Keep your team growing through regular knowledge sharing. Host tech talks, run workshops, and build communities where developers can learn from each other. Support conference attendance and training programs so developers can bring back new skills and approaches for tackling technical debt.
Highlight the wins when teams successfully reduce technical debt. Call out great work in team meetings and create incentives for consistently high-quality code. This positive reinforcement helps everyone see that maintaining code health is valued work that advances their career and helps the company succeed.
Getting real business value from technical debt reduction takes more than just fixing issues. It requires careful tracking and sustained effort to prevent debt from creeping back in.
Good measurement starts with picking the right metrics. Key performance indicators (KPIs) should cover both technical aspects and business impact:
Make time to celebrate when you see measurable improvements. Simple things like weekly team shoutouts or a achievements board can keep everyone excited about the work. When people feel recognized, they stay committed to keeping technical debt low.
Managing technical debt means regularly checking what’s working. Look at your data and make changes based on what you find. For example, if faster deployment times come from one specific effort, put more resources there. But be ready to change course when something isn’t delivering results.
Think of technical debt like home maintenance - regular upkeep prevents bigger problems. Hold team discussions to review progress and identify new issues early. Focus on steady improvements rather than quick fixes. This balanced approach supports both stability and new development.
Share concrete examples of how reducing technical debt helps the business. Use your measurement data to show improvements in:
By staying focused on measurement and continuous improvement, teams can keep technical debt under control while still moving forward. For teams looking to improve their documentation process, DocuWriter.ai offers AI-powered tools to make documentation faster and more accurate. Check out DocuWriter.ai to see how it can help your development workflow.